+29.9%
AAPL vs XLF
+15.8%
+14.2%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +3.5% | +1.8% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +5.5% | -3.8% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +5.0% | +9.9% | -4.9% | +0.1% |
| 3M | +13.1% | +2.6% | +10.4% | +11.7% |
| 6M | +26.5% | +15.6% | +10.9% | +17.4% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +9.4% | +19.5% | +21.2% |
| 1Y | +29.9% | +14.7% | +15.2% | +20.1% |
| All | +29.9% | +15.8% | +14.2% | +20.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling