+29.9%
AAPL vs UMC
+112.5%
-82.6%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -2.1% | +7.4% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -14.7% | +16.3% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +5.0% | -32.9% | +37.9% | +5.3% |
| 3M | +13.1% | -22.2% | +35.2% | +13.3% |
| 6M | +26.5% | +25.9% | +0.6% | +22.5% |
| YTD | +28.9% | +107.9% | -79.0% | +25.6% |
| 1Y | +29.9% | +115.0% | -85.1% | +25.5% |
| All | +29.9% | +112.5% | -82.6% | +25.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling