+33.9%
AAPL vs PG
-4.9%
+38.8%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.3% | -2.2% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +1.9% | -1.8% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +3.0% | -0.2% | +3.2% | +3.0% |
| 3M | +2.9% | +4.8% | -1.9% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +22.1% | -6.1% | +28.2% | +22.1% |
| YTD | +18.0% | +4.5% | +13.6% | +17.9% |
| 1Y | +33.9% | -5.3% | +39.2% | +31.6% |
| All | +33.9% | -4.9% | +38.8% | +31.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling