+100.9%
AAOI vs ZTS
-26.9%
+127.8%
-73.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | +7.5% | -14.8% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -27.9% | +15.4% | -43.3% | -20.7% |
| 30D | -51.2% | +25.8% | -77.0% | -43.6% |
| 3M | -55.0% | +18.1% | -73.1% | -48.7% |
| 6M | -65.7% | -19.7% | -46.0% | -55.5% |
| YTD | +70.0% | -27.5% | +97.5% | +126.1% |
| 1Y | +100.9% | -26.7% | +127.6% | +166.1% |
| All | +100.9% | -26.9% | +127.8% | +166.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling