+100.9%
AAOI vs ZM
+8.0%
+92.9%
-73.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | 0.0% | -7.3% | -7.3% |
| 7D | -27.9% | -8.4% | -19.5% | -26.4% |
| 30D | -51.2% | -1.9% | -49.3% | -50.6% |
| 3M | -55.0% | -10.1% | -44.9% | -54.2% |
| 6M | -65.7% | -13.9% | -51.9% | -64.6% |
| YTD | +70.0% | +6.4% | +63.6% | +94.1% |
| 1Y | +100.9% | +9.6% | +91.4% | +130.8% |
| All | +100.9% | +8.0% | +92.9% | +130.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling