+100.9%
AAOI vs NTAP
+66.6%
+34.3%
-73.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | -1.6% | -5.7% | -6.2% |
| 7D | -27.9% | -16.1% | -11.8% | -18.5% |
| 30D | -51.2% | -15.9% | -35.3% | -44.5% |
| 3M | -55.0% | -1.2% | -53.7% | -52.8% |
| 6M | -65.7% | +70.1% | -135.8% | -72.2% |
| YTD | +70.0% | +77.9% | -7.9% | +40.6% |
| 1Y | +100.9% | +68.1% | +32.8% | +90.3% |
| All | +100.9% | +66.6% | +34.3% | +90.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling