+2.1%
AAL vs IEMG
+38.7%
-36.6%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.7% | -0.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +2.2% | -6.0% | -5.4% |
| 30D | -20.8% | +4.6% | -25.4% | -23.6% |
| 3M | -1.3% | +0.4% | -1.6% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +5.4% | +16.4% | -11.0% | -9.6% |
| YTD | -14.4% | +25.4% | -39.8% | -31.2% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | +38.3% | -36.2% | -27.5% |
| All | +2.1% | +38.7% | -36.6% | -27.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling