+2.1%
AAL vs HTZ
-58.1%
+60.2%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.3% | -0.1% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +7.5% | -11.2% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -20.8% | +47.4% | -68.2% | -22.6% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -54.9% | +53.6% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +5.4% | -47.0% | +52.4% | +6.7% |
| YTD | -14.4% | -55.3% | +40.9% | -11.9% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | -57.6% | +59.7% | +4.3% |
| All | +2.1% | -58.1% | +60.2% | +4.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling